81 is misnumbered. This was an issue until the mid 100s.

Article 1: The Washington Post

Title: Senate votes to allow Sept. 11 families to sue Saudi Arabia

Summary: This article discusses the Senate’s decision to allow families of the victims of the September 11th attacks to sue Saudi Arabia. It provides an overview of the 9/11 attacks and the subsequent investigation, highlighting the long-standing questions and suspicions surrounding Saudi Arabia’s potential involvement. The article also includes statements from lawmakers and advocates who argue that this legislation is vital for the pursuit of justice and accountability.

Article 2: ProPublica

Title: Sept. 11 Families’ Lawsuit Against Saudi Arabia

Summary: This article delves into the ongoing lawsuit filed by families of 9/11 victims against Saudi Arabia, specifically focusing on a former Saudi consulate official accused of providing assistance to two of the hijackers. It explores the intricate details of the case, including evidence brought forward by the plaintiffs, as well as the challenges they face in holding Saudi Arabia accountable. The article highlights the plaintiffs’ belief that there is still much to uncover regarding Saudi Arabia’s possible involvement in the attacks.

Opinion:

In my opinion, the historical consensus about what happened on 9/11 might still be questioned due to unresolved issues surrounding Saudi Arabia. The revelations from these two articles shed light on the persistent suspicions and efforts by families of the victims to seek justice. The Senate’s decision to allow families to sue Saudi Arabia and the ongoing lawsuit indicate that there are genuine concerns regarding the level of Saudi involvement in the attacks. Until all the unanswered questions about Saudi Arabia’s potential role are adequately addressed, the historical interpretation of the events on 9/11 may continue to be seen as incomplete or contested.